Investigation of Uttarakhand HC orders investigates the death of man in Haldwani clashes – ‘Eyewitness statement ignored’. Bharat News

Investigation of Uttarakhand HC orders investigates the death of man in Haldwani clashes - 'Eyewitness statement ignored'. Bharat News

The Uttarakhand High Court has ordered a Special Investigation Team, who was allegedly shot and killed during the Bainbhulpura riots in Haldwani in February 2024.

A division bench of Chief Justice G. Narendra and Justice Alok Mehra has also ordered the transfer of the investigating officer, Neeraj Bhakuni outside the district. The SIT has been asked to submit a progress report every month, and the court will monitor the investigation.

The petition was filed by Parvez, the victim Faheem’s brother, demanding a CBI inquiry into his death.

The story continues below this advertisement

On June 4, after the final report was submitted by the IO, the court said that the word ‘shocking’ would be a sense.

“IO appears that IO has gone around recording the statements of all and diverse and it comes to conclusion that they have not confirmed not to witness the Act and on that basis, he attempts to justify his work to ignore the complainant’s statement, which despite shooting his brother, claims to use the fiery. Where an eyewitness statement is ignored and a closed report is based on those who do not appear as eyewitnesses, ”the court commented.

Subsequently, the DGP was asked to look at the closure report and record his statement as an affidavit. The court set up an SIT on Wednesday after the affidavit.

The petition filed by the victim’s brother had alleged that no one was Progress in investigation The Chief Judicial Magistrate’s court ordered an inquiry in May last year.

The story continues below this advertisement

Earlier, on the IO’s statement that the video was tampered with Pendrive, the court said, “Is Pendrive subjected to a forensic examination by competent authorities, it is not upcoming. IO said that the source of WhatsApp video has not been revealed, which does not perform his duties as an exploiter”.

It further said: “The pendrive is tampered with, stating that he has played the role of a judge, and by trying to ignore the question and truth of the statement of the eyewitness, based on the statements of the third parties, he has played the role of a defense. Weapons, here, he believes the role of a ballistic expert.”

Iwarya Raj, Indian Express

Iaria Raj is a reporter with the Indian Express that covers South Haryana. An alumna of the Asian College of Journalism and the University of Kerala, he started his career in the Indian Express as a sub-editor in the Delhi city team. In her current situation, she reports from Gurgaon and covers neighboring districts. She likes to tell the stories of the people and the story hopes to find Mool in journalism. … read more

,