Underlining that the allocation of 3.7 acres of land has been discontinued by the State Government to the International Mentiles and Media Center (IAMC) established by former Chief Justice of India (CJI) NV Ramana, which the Telangana High Court has justified the Telangana High Court on Friday.
“It is self -centered that to achieve a bole -friend, the instrument will also have to justify the end. The court is of the opinion that Bona Fid End cannot be obtained from suspicious means, especially when the state is involved. The court has not responded to the state that on a request to Honor, everyone said that the government has been given to all.
The IAMC was established in Hyderabad in 2021 to promote alternative dispute solutions. As a sitting CJI, Justice Ramana wrote the Trust Did for the establishment of “Charitable Public Trust”. Former Supreme Court judges RV Revendran and L. Nejseva Rao were nominated as a life trustee, while a minister of the state of Telangana and Chief Justice of Telangana High Court were nominated as former officer trustee.
A bench of Justice’s Laxman and K Sujana criticized the government for arbitrary allocation of land with “inappropriate hasty”.
“We would also like to indicate that the government’s conduct was in a hurry to allocate the land. It is noteworthy that the certificate of possession was issued in favor of the IAMC, which is not well already before preparing and communicating the terms of allocation.
The Bharat President Committee is in the land allotted from the cost-free land, Serlingpalli, a revenue sub-division, which also has a tech corridor, including Hitech City and Gachibovali. However, the current Congress government also defended the allocation. Chief Minister Rewanath Reddy is in the three -member trustee board.
The court quashed the land allocation on the basis that the IAMC was not eligible for free allocation of land as a “private body”.
The story continues below this advertisement
The court admitted that the allocation was contrary to the rules of the Telangana Urban Area Development Act, 1975, which provides that government land could only be settled through sale or exchange or lease or public auction.
The court said that the rules provide that allocation in favor of a private body can only be made when such a body is registered under the Company Act. It was then mentioned that, according to the date of allocation, IAMC was not registered as a company. The court also admitted that, as per the 2012 government land allocation policy, the land can only be allocated at the market price, which can only be considered for the departments of the state government and free allocation for poverty line families.
While IAMC argued that it was a “public charitable trust”, petitioners challenged the allocation argued that the body was earning profits and earning remuneration.
The High Court said, “A private body like IAMC can only be done for a public purpose and after collecting the applicable market price.”
,
