‘Socialist’, ‘secular’ in ideological landmines; Time to undo time: Articles in RSS-Linked Weekly | Bharat News

The article published on the website of the organizer on Saturday stated the insertion of two words as a “constitutional fraud work” and said that these words were not only “cosmetic additions”, but also “ideologically applied”, which opposed Bharata’s civilized identity and constitution’s spirit of democracy.

“We must be clear: No component assembly ever approved these words. The 42nd amendment was passed during the Emergency when Parliament worked under Duresh, with opposition leaders in jail and media said,” The article said.

This was a “task of constitutional fraud”, when they are unconscious, to make someone’s wish.
Dr. Niranjan B. Poojar said in Opinion Pisse, “Bharat should return to the original preamble, as the founder is imagined by the fathers … using us emergency constitutional sin and re -regaining the preamble for the people of India.”

“Words ‘socialists’ and ‘secular’ are not Indians in the soul, are not constitutional in the process and are not democratic in intentions. They are ideological landmine, designed to eliminate religious values, justify the state outreach and serve political appeasement,” he said.

Given that due to a “constitutional clean”, the article states that the removal of ‘socialist’ and ‘secular’ is not about ideology, but “restoring constitutional honesty, re -reinforcing national dignity and ending political hypocrisy”.

“If we really respect Ambedkar, respect democracy, and believe in Bharat, we should work,” he insisted.

“We are not a socialist country. We are not a secular-eightest state. We are a secular civilization which is vested in plural, self-rule and spiritual autonomy. We have the courage to say so in our constitution,” it said.

The article states that after the insertion of the period ‘Secular’ in preambleThe “Indian version” of the interpretation of secularism lost neutrality and became “smokescreen for state-provided discrimination against Hindus in the name of minority rights”.

“Away from separating religion from the state, where it was conceptualized in Europe, Indian secularism has denied equal rights to Hindus in matters such as intervention of state in Hindu temples, religious education, and education,” it has been claimed.

At the same time, minorities enjoy “undisputed privileges” – from running their institutions without intervention to obtain targeted subsidies, it said.

“Furthermore, secularism is not a neutral word in real sense -it is developed to reduce the rights of the Catholic Church in Europe,” it is said to be Jewish, Protestant and Gyanodaya roots, especially in Europe.

“However, in the Indian context, it is systematically designed and pushed to defame Hindutva, its righteous nature and the overall world vision,” it said.

“It is no coincidence that Marxist historians, leftist politicians and Western intellectuals have aggressively pushed secularism as a defined feature of Indian modernity to suit their agenda,” it said.

The article called socialism a “global agenda” and said that it is not just an economic model, but a “political weapon”.

“It kills individual enterprise, promotes bureaucracy control and promotes a grandmother state, where citizens become dependent, not the creators. Preliminary involvement of ‘socialist’ has allowed gradual governments to justify the state’s overrage, nationalize resources and torture private innovation – in the name of all public names.” This socialism has only “deep inequality”, instead of resolving it, it has been claimed.

“As an economist BR Shenoy warned in early 1955, Nehruvian Socialism will take India to ‘bureaucratic secrets and economic stagnation’. Decades later, that’s what happened.” So why this old, unsuccessful ideology should fold our constitution? “

On July 5, an editorial published in the Hindi weekly Panchjan associated with the RSS said that Rahul Gandhi had admitted a few years ago that the emergency was a mistake, and said that the Congress leader should come forward to fix that mistake.

Weekly editor Hitesh Shankar said in the editorial, “If the Emergency was a mistake, the constitutional amendments made during that period are also the result of that mistake,” Hitashi Shankar, the editor of the Weekly, said in the editorial.

He said, “If Rahul Gandhi and Congress consider this amendment as a wrong decision, they should demand a review of this amendment in Parliament and take the initiative to remove the words ‘secular’ and ‘socialist’,” he said.
Shankar said that the country should also come with “new discussion, new resolutions and new courage” in this matter.

He said, “Along with discussion on (two) words (in preamble), the process and validity should also be discussed,” he said.