Former Haryana Chief Minister and Congress leader Bhupinder Singh Hooda canceled a land deal at Shikohpur in Gurugram “illegally” in favor of Robert Wadra in 2008, accused the enforcement directorate before the Delhi Court on Thursday.
Ed’s Special Counsel Zoheb Hasain said, “Special Joheb Hasain, a special advocate of Ed in front of Special Judge Sushant Changotra, said,” The mutation for registration of the registration of the then Director General of Bhoomi Sankan and the Records-Cum-Intectioner-General of Haryana (IAS Ashok Khamka) was canceled.
It is being mentioned here that in 2008, the purchase of 3.5 acres of land in Shikohpur from Shikoshwar Properties from Omkareshwar Properties and selling land DLF Four years later by a company called Skylight Hospitality for Rs 58 crore, whose director Vadra was.
“There were irregularities such as false announcements. This company had no ability to pay. It had only 1 lakh rupees in capital … The actual payment was later pioneer to the theft of stamp duty,” Hosain, who was with Ed’s Special Public Prosecutor NK Matta, argued.
The ED was arguing on its charge sheet, which was filed last Thursday against Vadra and 10 other (eight companies and two persons). The charge sheet was filed a day after attaching 43 immovable properties associated with Vadra, Sky Light Hospitality Private Limited and others.
Hussain said, “The seller never checked. The buyer had the ability to buy. The government was cheated by revenue and stamp duties.
He said, “The actual transaction was 15 crores, not 7.5 crores … all income of crime flowed for Vadra -owned companies,” he said.
The story continues below this advertisement
According to sources, Ed’s charge sheet alleged that the sales deed “False” said that the payment was obtained through the check, which was never really encountered. The charge sheet also said that according to sources, the stamp duty worth `45 lakhs was incorrectly developed. The ED has temporarily fixed the total income of the crime of Rs 58 crore.
Sources say the charge sheet claims that the officials of the Town and Country Planning Directorate and Country Planning (DTCP) were under pressure on the officials of the higher officials.
Hussain argued before the court, “All private limited. Companies were converted into LLPS (limited liability partnership) … as there are more disclosure requirements in the past,” Hussain argued before the court.
The case will now be heard on 31 July and will underline the individual roles of all the accused individuals in the ED case. After the ED ends its arguments, the judge is likely to decide whether to take cognizance of the charge sheet or not.
,
