After the decision of the Anna University rape case, AIADMK accused of cover-up: ‘Who is Sir?’ , Bharat News

After the decision of the Anna University rape case, AIADMK accused of cover-up: 'Who is Sir?' , Bharat News

A special women court in Chennai on Monday sentenced a DMK supporter in a historic verdict, a biryani seller and a known DMK supporter, in a historic verdict, which attracts praise and political IRE in a special women’s court in Chennai. The case which has ignited the emotional public discourse since December has now increased in a full-developed political face between the ruling DMK of Tamil Nadu and the AIADMK.

Gyanaskaran, Found guilty In 11 allegations, including sexual harassment, rape, kidnapping and criminal intimidation, first argued for generosity citing family responsibilities. His appeal was rejected by the court, which instead supported the prosecution case and appreciated the Tamil Nadu Police for “extraordinary and rapid” investigation within five months. But the court’s decision has not pacified the storm.

‘Unanswered questions’

Leader of the Opposition and AIADMK chief Edappi’s Palaniswamy (EPS) took on social media soon after the verdict, which he said “unanswered questions” in the first information report (FIR), especially a mysterious “sir” referred to during the alleged attack. The EPS accused the DMK government of preserving the higher-up.

The story continues below this advertisement

“Despite the DMK’s efforts to protect his man, from the voices of the people – from the streets to social media – was posted on X”. ,

He concluded with a politically charged promise: “Once AIADMK returns to power, the truth about ‘Sir’ will be revealed.”

Stalin replied

Chief Minister MK Stalin responded rapidly and rapidly, rapidly and rapidly responded rapidly, accusing the state police of handling the case of handling the case and exploiting the trauma of a young woman for electoral benefits. “The High Court praised our fair and Intense Investigation, “Stalin said in a post on X.” The police has appreciated the police. This decision has silenced those who pretend to care about the safety of women, but are actually looking for political gains from a tragedy. ,

The incident, which shook the student community of Tamil Nadu and took place on 23 December due to protests in the premises across the state.

Celebration offer
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UFSO2NIOWLY

According to court documents, Gyansesekaran forcibly entered the Anna University campus, attacked a male friend from rape, then sexually assaulted and filmed the young woman, later used footage to intimidate her.

Welcoming women’s rights by advocates and student groups, their punishment has highlighted deep political farewells in the state. While DMK leaders frame the decision as proof of administrative capacity and legal resolution, AIADMK stressed that the most powerful player in crime remains unnamed and unpublished.

The story continues below this advertisement

The word “#Whoisthatsir” has been running on social media in Tamil Nadu since then.

Sentence (T) Anna University Gyansekaran Life Capture (T) Anna University DMK pro -Gyansekaran (T) Anna University sexual harassment DMK (T) Anna University Rape Case Political Controversy (T) Anna University AIADMK DMK Case (T) Anna University "Sir" Mystery (T) Anna University EPS Stalin Sexual Harassment Case (T) Anna University Case FIR "Sir", "Sir" Controversy (T) Anna University Paaliyal Valakku (T) Anna University DMK GNANASEKARAN (T) Anna University "Sir" Yaar (T) Anna University EPS Stalin Vivadham