The Supreme Court on Monday said that the husband and wife take a nap on each other, a sign of a broken relationship as it separates the decision of the Punjab and Haryana High Court that the secretly recorded telephone conversation of parties in a marriage cannot be accepted as evidence in divorce proceedings.
Hearing the divorce case, the Punjab and Haryana High Court stated that the wife’s telephonic conversation without her amount of knowledge “can be used as evidence in front of a family court”, ie, the right to privacy “, ie, the right to the petitioner-wife.
“Some arguments have been made that allowing such evidence will endanger domestic harmony and marital relationships as it will encourage snuping on the husband and wife, therefore, violating the purpose of Section 122 of the Evidence Act. We do not think that we do not think that to reach such a platform, we do not think to reach each other for each other for each other for each other for each other for each other for each other. -The other is taken away.
The Bathinda Family Court had allowed the husband to depend on the telephone call recorded with his wife to prove allegations of cruelty. The wife challenged it before the High Court, arguing that her conversation was recorded without her consent, and it was allowed to be used as evidence, which would dissolve her fundamental right for privacy.
,
