In a scary comment on judicial power structures, a division bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court has compared the relationship between a caste system between the High Court and the District Judiciary, given that judges in the lower judiciary are treated like “shudras” and “Les Misérables”, while the judges of the High Court act with the accounts of the High Court.
The French word, “Les, translates into English” in English and is usually used to deliver the poor and marginalized, as is in the French novel named Victor Hugo’s French name French.
A division bench of Justices Atul Sreedharan and Dinesh Kumar Paliwal made observations on July 14, ending the end of the former additional district and Sessions Judge Jagat Mohan Chaturvedi. He was rejected in 2014 after passing the deviation bail orders in cases related to the Vyapam scam.
The court said that the judicial officer had to face “gross injustice” and ordered the restoration of his pension benefits. It also imposed a cost of Rs 5 lakh on the state, which “he was subject to difficulties for his and his family” and “faced humiliation in society, only to pass judicial orders, without the material coming on records, even to establish corruption on the liberation of the priority of possibilities.
Speaking on the hierarchy surrounded in the judiciary, the bench noticed, “The relationship between the District Judiciary and the High Court in the state is not based on mutual respect for each other, but one where the feeling of fear and inferiority is consciously included as the subconscious of the other.
Describing the dynamic between the High Court and the lower courts, the judges said, “The disappointing relationship between the judges of the High Court and the District Judge of the District Judge is one between a feudal God and Serf.”
He said, “The body language of the Judges of the District Judiciary is reduced before the High Court judge when they greeted a judge of the High Court, which makes the judges of the district judiciary the only identifier of the mammals to the judges of the district judiciary,” said.
The story continues below this advertisement
The bench added, “Examples of individual district judiciary judges to participate in the judges of High Court judges (desired by them) on railway platforms and to wait on them are common, thus finishing a colonial leave with a sense of destroying a colonial collapse.
The bench said that the Judges of the District Judge to work in the High Court Registry are not offered a seat by the High Court judges, and when they are on a rare occasion, they hesitate to sit in front of the High Court judge, “said the bench.
The court also noticed that “the vashikaran and slavery of the psyche of the judges of the district judiciary is complete and irreversible, so it seems”.
“A High Court, which is ever ready to stimulate the District Judiciary for the most comfortable of its errors, ensures that the district judiciary is placed under the fear of punishment and sick fear,” it said.
The story continues below this advertisement
“The fear of the district judiciary makes sense. They have families, the children who go to school, the parents undergoing treatment, a house is constructed, saving and when the High Court has suddenly terminated his service … then he and his entire family are out on the streets without any pension and the stigma of facing a society that faces his disgrace,” the court said.
The court noticed that “a district judiciary who is forced to work forever under this fear, cannot overcome justice and will be overcome with justice instead”.
It states, “All this connects the passive subjugation of the district judiciary, which is psychological, which eventually reflects in their judicial work, where Bells is not given even in the most qualified cases, the punishment is recorded in the absence of evidence … It all seems to be in the name of saving his job, in the name of saving his job, in the case that the petitioner in this case is that the petitioner in this case,
,
