Saying that the courts should not suppress the role of the legislature, Supreme Court Judge Justice Surya Kant has stated that judicial overlapping, “although well -intentions”, ignore the delicate balance of power.
While giving the main speech on Tuesday at the Asia Society Northern California, San Francisco, he also said the need to promote judicial literacy and transparency, saying that “without judicial literacy, transparency can be armed – leading to misinformation rather than insight.”
On the separation of the powers, Justice Kant said: “The practice of judicial power should be directed by humility and constitutional boundaries. The courts should not suppress the role of the Legislature or should override the will of the people. Instead they should act as facilities of democratic dialogues – to strengthen the partisan regime, also that we stop the laws of laws.”
He insisted that “judicial exaggeration, although well with intentions, harassing the delicate balance of powers” and it is said: “true constitutional protector is not in dominance but in restraint-one-one such ethos that confirms the validity of the judiciary in a lively democracy.”
न्यायपालिका को डिजिटल युग की वास्तविकताओं को समायोजित करने के लिए न्यायपालिका की आवश्यकता को छूते हुए, न्यायमूर्ति कांत ने कहा: “इंटरनेट और सोशल मीडिया की शक्ति ने वैश्विक दर्शकों के लिए तुरंत न्यायिक निर्णय उपलब्ध कराए हैं। यह डिजिटल पारदर्शिता जवाबदेही और भेद्यता दोनों को लाती है। एक हेडलाइन या हैशटैग को हॉल करने के लिए, इस माहौल को हाउ, हाउ, हाउ, ह्विसर, गरिमा और संयम के With, they have become important as the result.
The judge said that this change in expectations should be fulfilled not with defensiveness, but with thoughtful engagement. While calling for transparency, he said: “We must recognize that transparency is not opposed to judicial freedom; rather, it strengthens public confidence. A judiciary that shares its processes, methods and principles in clear and open words, gives citizens the right to rely on their functioning, even when the results can be different from personal expectations.”
However, he warned that transparency alone is not enough, but should be with an active effort to promote judicial literacy – helping the public understand the complexities of legal logic and constitutional values.
The story continues below this advertisement
“As the courts appear more, their work must be more intelligent. Legal awareness campaign, simplified summary of major decisions, partnership with educational institutions, and open communication forums can demolish judicial functioning,” he said.
Justice Kant said: “When civilians are equipped with the safety measures of the fixed process, the role of the example, and the boundaries under which the courts are operated, both are equipped with respecting judicial decisions and being severely attached to a constructive manner.”
He insisted that even the judiciary opened its procedures for more understanding and dialogue, “This should be cautious against viral misunderstandings and dangers caused by media tests. These incidents threaten to distort rather than deepening public engagement. Cosadic stories, selectively edit court proceedings clearly.
Justice Kant said that “When judicial decisions are judged in the court of public opinion, before they are understood in the court of law, the result is not a citizen empowerment, but confusion, condensed, and ultimately, there is erosion of faith.”
The story continues below this advertisement
Stating that the courts are often trolled to follow the rule of law, he said that it is a threat to the independence of the judiciary and said that such challenges should be firmly dealt with.
“In today’s hyper-connected world, we are becoming witness to the rise of a huge digital community-Socle, impatient, and often without thinking-the association with the law is shaped by understanding and more emotions. Many of them expect many of them to align with their transient feelings and impulses. Trolling, misinformation, misinformation, and individual attacks.
,
